We start at the original sources

Imagine a story passed from person to person — by the end it sounds nothing like the start. That's how many peptide claims are born. We prefer to go straight to the source: to the scientific studies themselves and to the bodies that officially review medicines.

• ✓Studies by researchers, not forum posts
• ✓Official authorities like Europe's EMA and the US FDA
• ✓No marketing promises from sales pages

You can check everything yourself

Trust is good, checking is better. That's why we link to the real sources instead of asking you to take our word for it. You don't have to simply believe us — follow the links and see for yourself.

• ✓Links to public databases of medical literature
• ✓Links to the worldwide registry of clinical trials
• ✓All freely accessible, with no detour through us

We're honest when something is unclear

Sometimes the research is thin, or so far there are only tests in animals — not in people. We don't hide that, because an honest "we don't know yet" is worth more than a nice but false promise. When the evidence is missing, we say exactly that.

• ✓We clearly separate claims from proven facts
• ✓Animal tests are no proof of an effect in humans
• ✓We name open questions instead of hiding them

We update when knowledge changes

Science never stands still. What holds today can be added to or corrected tomorrow by a new study. When the sources move on, we follow — because our content should grow with what's currently known, not stay frozen in place.